Required labeler capacity
Configuration output
Matching U-Packer models
| Model | Nameplate | Practical ×η | Verdict |
|---|
Practical = nameplate × your η. “Marginal” fits on paper but depends on hitting η — confirm with factory test data.
Output over time
Size guard (wrap-around)
Methodology — formulas, constants, assumptions
Everything this calculator does is published here so you can verify it. Two directions are supported: from a line requirement to a machine size, and from a rotary configuration to its practical output.
F1 — Theoretical and practical capacity (rotary machines)
Q_theory (BPH) = bottle plates S × turret speed n (rpm) × 60 Q_practical = Q_theory × overall efficiency ηEach bottle plate on the turret labels one container per revolution, so the theoretical output is a pure identity. What separates nameplate from reality is η. Instead of a fixed “fudge factor”, η is built from a time budget:
η = (T_shift − T_loss) ÷ T_shift T_loss = roll changes × time per change + SKU changeovers × time per changeover + glue-system care + unplanned stops| SKU pattern | η preset | What drives it |
|---|---|---|
| Single SKU, long runs | 0.94 | Almost no changeover; roll changes only |
| 2–3 SKUs, occasional changeover | 0.90 | 1–2 changeovers per day |
| Many SKUs, small batches | 0.84 | Frequent changeover + frequent roll changes |
Worked validation example: an 18-plate turret at 12 rpm gives Q_theory = 18 × 12 × 60 = 12,960 BPH; at η = 0.90 the practical output is 11,664 BPH — a 10,000 BPH requirement with 12% headroom (11,200 BPH) is met with margin to spare.
F2 — From required capacity to a model
Q_required = line speed × (1 + headroom), headroom 10–15% recommended Model fits when nameplate BPH × η ≥ Q_requiredThe matching table above is driven by U-Packer nameplate data (station counts and rated BPH from therotary OPP hot melt seriesspecification table and sister models). Models are shown smallest-sufficient first — usually the most economical answer. “Marginal” models meet the requirement at nameplate speed but not at your η; treat them as candidates only if the efficiency assumptions can be improved (fewer SKUs, larger label rolls).
F5 — Size guard for wrap-around labeling
Label length L = π × bottle diameter + overlap (10–15 mm, 12 mm used here) Label height ≤ usable body height − clearanceThe guard flags two hard limits of the standard round-bottle OPP series — label length ≤ 600 mm and label height ≤ 130 mm — plus a handling warning for small-diameter containers at high speed. For the full five-check fit analysis (taper, shrink sleeve), use theBottle & Label Size Checker. Linear machines follow a different capacity identity: Q = conveyor speed (m/min) × 60 ÷ bottle pitch (m).
Constants used
| Constant | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Recommended headroom | 10–15% | Labeler should never be the line bottleneck |
| η presets | 0.94 / 0.90 / 0.84 | Adjustable — replace with your measured η |
| Label overlap | 12 mm | Within the usual 10–15 mm for hot melt wrap-around |
| Standard series label limits | ≤ 600 mm long, ≤ 130 mm high | From the UHL rotary OPP specification table |
Frequently asked questions
What does BPH mean, and how do I convert bottles per minute?
BPH is bottles per hour — the standard capacity unit for labeling and filling lines. Multiply bottles per minute (BPM) by 60 to get BPH: a 200 BPM line runs 12,000 BPH. This calculator accepts either unit and always shows both.
Why does my line never reach the machine’s nameplate speed?
Nameplate BPH is theoretical: stations × rpm × 60 with zero stops. Real production loses time to label-roll changes, SKU changeovers, glue-system care and unplanned stops. The overall efficiency η = (shift time − lost time) ÷ shift time typically lands between 0.85 and 0.95 for a single-SKU long run, and nearer 0.80–0.88 for multi-SKU short batches. That is why this tool applies η before matching a model.
How much headroom should I plan above my line speed?
Size the labeler for your upstream/downstream line speed plus 10–15%. The labeler should never be the bottleneck: filler and packer efficiencies differ, and a labeler running permanently at 100% of its nameplate has no reserve for catch-up after a micro-stop.
Does the rotary formula (stations × rpm) apply to linear machines?
No. A linear (in-line) labeler’s theoretical output is Q = conveyor speed v (m/min) × 60 ÷ bottle pitch p (m), where pitch = bottle diameter + minimum gap set by the feed screw or star wheel. Rotary machines dominate above roughly 6,000 BPH; below that, linear and single-station machines are often the economical answer.
How accurate is this calculator?
Indicative, by design. The formulas are exact; the inputs that vary by factory (efficiency η, changeover times) are stated openly and can be adjusted. Final machine sizing is confirmed against your physical bottle and label samples — send us samples and we validate the calculation on the actual machine.